About

Majenko is a hacker. A hardware hacker, that is. He likes to take bits of old kit (or even new kit) and “bend” it to do things it really shouldn’t.

He fancies himself as a bit of a “technomancer” – a necromancer of technology – taking old, dead technology and bringing it back to life by replacing everything inside it.

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “About

  1. X Era Xcorp

    “technomancer” – a necromancer of technology – taking old, dead technology and bringing it back to life by replacing everything inside it.

    hmmm i never knew this much of you man gotta ask now, what do you think of CRT tech? “cathode ray tubes” i been thinking after stripping one off of a old good working tv i had and what i was looking to do was use the ray tube part and try to use it as a projectile of plasma concentrating the protons or plasma using the electro magnetism properties that control the electron flow on the x/y on your 2D screen to excite the rgb across the spectrum, but given the fact that im not looking to target any rgb or pixels for that matter we just have targets we are looking to focus on and simply control the trajectory of the beam just like you would inside a vacuum tube. Vacuum tube huh Frank? yes yes i know by definition we aren’t in a vacuum tube or space for that matter so you cant contain anything like protons/electrons/plasma because the lack of the tube part, yes i know I’ve done my fair amount of research, which is we know that while we aren’t in a tube per-say we are in deed inside a bubble called earth and itself is a sorta vacuum from space it self just like in space it is also a vacuum itself, Now with this in mind “technomancer” wat do you think about CRT ? what can we change to solve for the equation that’s missing? i mean think of “ghostbusters plasma gun” (yeah yeah its a movie just science fiction) Yah ! sure everything about today was “science fiction” not too long ago “couple of decades” and is individuals like you and i that see to change the way we see things in life through the use of innovations and emerging tech and in extreme cases tech that we re-purpose or the we come up with.

    Like

    Reply
    1. majenko Post author

      It would never work. The tube is a high vacuum for a reason, and that reason has nothing to do with “containing” the beam. It is all to do with there being nothing in there for the electrons to hit. If there were gas in there (as there is in the open air) you wouldn’t have an electron beam, you’d have an electron spray. An electron bouncing all over the place. An electron bagatelle. Also it would emit lethal ionizing radiation. You might as well walk around with an open microwave, or a hospital X-ray machine.

      Like

      Reply
      1. X Era Xcorp

        ill work on a come back for that based on science, but it seems that the issue is NOT containing a atmospheric pressurized secluding the ionized particles from entering the chamber where one will find the control of electrons, think of a non toxic or toxic salt or some sort of compound that electron love to interact in and this cloud will be bridging the gap between you and your target, i do something similar when reading brain signals and converting this inputs into motor output, kinda like electromyography and the point is that one wire is attached to one side of the tempo while there’s another on the opposite end and the cathode “just like the cathode ray tube” electrons mv/uv travel from cathode to anode “anode being the target and not by chance but because of physics, opposite electron are by nature attracted to each other and will take the quickest route to meet the other, same example can be seen inside of a mosfet where electron are trapped because the gate is close till you send it a signal to open letting its hole of dope be filled with the opposite electrons and therefor making a bridge for electrons to meet one another, might be a little off but the science is logic if you catch my drift.

        Like

  2. majenko Post author

    There is one subtle difference which you have mentioned but not recognised: “there’s another on the opposite end and the cathode”. That is not present in a CRT. In all the examples you have cited you are bridging a gap between anode and cathode with a stream of electrons. That just doesn’t happen in a CRT. In that system the cathode is to one side, and is used initially to attract the electrons out of the anode and accelerate them. Then the magnetic field contains them in the form of a beam and they fire straight past the cathode to strike the phosphors through the shadow plate. Without a vacuum that just isn’t possible since they would just scatter as soon as they come out of the magnetic field. With no cathode ahead to attract them they become a confused mass. And, as the second law of thermodynamics states: entropy always increases. Without the control over the electrons they will just bounce around, bond with other atoms to ionise them, etc.

    Like

    Reply
    1. X Era Xcorp

      right but you missed the hole point of my theory on the “think of a non toxic or toxic salt or some sort of compound” this gas or cloud will act as a container where electrons can be contained just like in the tube of the CRT, the target is the anode think of it as if like the electrons are all pos or neg right? and then the only opposite is at the very end of the cloud where the gas bomb was deployed. does that makes sense to you ? i remember hearing about a gas bomb that planes wayyyy back in the day would use to explode it in thin air and the plane following that one plane that deployed it would simply fall out of the sky because where that one bomb was deployed the gasses in it had something to do with taking that mass that planes uses to stay at float in the trajectory of travel soooooo my theory would follow a similar path to that old technique that was pretty much decommissioned for some reason unknown to what i can recollect BUT i would say that a similar effect was used to sink submarines in depth of the ocean, where this bomb would explode and make the sub sink more than the time the it would need to unpressurized itself to go down more and if it didn’t then the sub valves would begin to explode from the oversized pressured from the oceans pressure not being accounted in time, ALSO the same technique was applied to sink battleships on the spot “think of the math and science behind the why planes and boats sink where near the bermuda triangle” SO my friend this all has been documented and is logical science and so my theory is not that far fetch and is very much possible. (not trying to force what i learn on you just trying to share where my ideas are being build from, that’s all )

      Like

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s